The many sources of disinformation in the Australia-China relationship
Disinformation is a scourge in the Australia-China relationship, making it harder to recognise areas of potential cooperation and manage differences in interests and values. Multiple sources exist with campaigns directed by Beijing at Australia being one. But downplaying or ignoring the others, as Foreign Minister Marise Payne appeared to do in a recent speech, raises questions about how this serves the national interest.
“Disinformation” is the new buzzword in Australia’s discussion of China. It refers to the intentional spreading of false information to manipulate an audience. And the spotlight is being shone on Beijing as the chief culprit.
In a June 16 speech at the National Security College of the Australian National University, Australia’s Foreign Minister, Marise Payne, called out China (and Russia) as having “carried out targeted disinformation campaigns seeking to undermine democratic debate and exacerbate social polarisation, and improve their own image in the COVID-19 context”.
Minister Payne referenced the findings of a European Commission report issued the previous week, as well as Twitter removing 32,000 accounts attributed to state-linked information operations, remarking it was “troubling that some countries are using the pandemic to undermine liberal democracy to promote their own more authoritarian models.”
So concerned is the Australian government by disinformation from China that a new unit will soon be established in the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade to combat it.
Some of the urgency is curious because to the extent that Beijing has sought to “improve its own image” — one of the aims of China’s disinformation campaign according to Minister Payne — there is little evidence to suggest it has been successful.
According to the 2020 Lowy Poll, the proportion of Australians who “trust [China] to act responsibly in the world” has crashed from 52 per cent to 23 per cent over the past two years. And on COVID-19 specifically, 69 per cent of Australians think that China handled the outbreak badly. This compared with just seven per cent who said the same of Australia.
In terms of elite opinion, an analysis piece on June 12 in the South China Morning Post observed that “[Australian] voices urging understanding of China’s position have all but evaporated from a national conversation that has long been informed by both hawkish and dovish sentiment”.
Nonetheless, that still leaves attempts by Beijing to “undermine democratic debate and exacerbate social polarisation”, the two other aims according to Minister Payne.
The Chinese Communist Party has form here. In 2017 it was reported that a visiting Chinese official had told Labor party leaders it would be a shame if the Chinese government had to tell the Chinese community in Australia that Labor did not support the bilateral relationship because of its opposition to an extradition treaty between the two countries.
The heartening news here is that social divisions vulnerable to exploitation are also within the capacity of the Australian government to manage. For example, as Adam Ni and Yun Jiang from the China Policy Centre observed in a recent submission to a parliamentary inquiry into Foreign Interference Through Social Media, rather than conceiving Chinese-Australian communities as a vector of Beijing’s disinformation campaigns, they are frequently the target. Accordingly, the appropriate Australian response is to “protect their rights as any other Australians, and treat them as a national asset and not a liability”.
Minister Payne’s speech was also notable for the selectivity of the disinformation examples that were included. A paragraph along the lines of the one below probably wasn’t even considered for the first draft:
“Now let me clear: disinformation doesn’t just come from autocracies. In recent months we have seen senior figures in the United States government spread conspiracy theories about how COVID-19 supposedly escaped from a Chinese laboratory. Australian intelligence agencies have confirmed they are unable to find any evidence supporting such claims. Even more alarming is that a US State Department document showcasing such theories was dressed up as “Five Eyes intelligence” and laundered through an Australian media organisation last month. Pro-Chinese government bots on Twitter are one thing. But when the front page of a major Sydney newspaper carries unfounded accusations that have the potential to incite attacks against Asian Australians, our determination to push back is even greater”.
Disinformation can also come from within the legislative branch of the Australian government.
In April, the National Party Member for Dawson in Queensland, George Christensen set up a website that urges readers to “speak up on China’s economic infiltration of our nation”. To egg them on, Christensen makes a number of claims, including that “Communist China is Australia’s largest foreign investor. They use their investments in Australia to guarantee a supply to China, also off-shoring both profits and tax. Government-owned businesses also do the bidding of the Chinese Communist Party in Australia.”
There is not a single data source that comes close to substantiating this. Last month the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) released new data for 2019 that showed China was Australia’s ninth largest foreign investment source, accounting for just two per cent of the total. The share of the US was 26 per cent. If Christensen doubts the quality of the ABS data, the US embassy in Canberra, as well as nearly every visiting senior American political leader, do not. These sources have long trumpeted the fact that because the US owns more Australian assets by a large margin than any other country, Washington, not Beijing, is “Australia’s most important economic partner”.
Yet Minister Payne’s speech also said nothing about her Coalition colleague’s blatant disinformation. Meanwhile, Christensen regularly pushes such falsehoods on Australian TV screens, radio airwaves and social media feeds. Never mind the backlash that could result from allowing these claims to go unchallenged, such as abuse directed at Asian Australians doing something as mundane as attending an auction to put in a bid for a family home.
There’s nothing wrong with plainly calling out disinformation from Beijing. But disinformation needs to be recognised and resisted when it comes from allies and at home as well.